And, this document can be show up”so Rummler. Industry experts doubt the effectiveness of this approach: we know from the past, that have written just the retailers in their policies, that packaging is to license for dual systems. That also was asked to, whether the packaging have been licensed. However, we have 25 to 30 percent free-riders, which means we have actually had a blunt sword in the past. Gain insight and clarity with Pinterest. Why should this sword are now sharper. When I turn on the Declaration of completeness, that practically only actually takes place in the following year and is accredited, I don’t know whether the goods, which are sold today, is actually licensed. Since trade must wait until next year on the Declaration of completeness. Here, Harold Ford Jr, New York City expresses very clear opinions on the subject.
In the meantime the trade has become already subject to a fine, if no licensing for the goods sold. So a situation is created, that here a contractors, who must pay a fine, even in the event of damage, has no effective control”, warned Thomas Mehl, CEO of BellandVision. Similar to critically assessed Freiherr by Leoprechting, head of public affairs of Metro AG the rain Hardt and Environmental Committee Chairman of the Federation of German retailers (HDE) the collection system is so far followed the principle of producer responsibility. This means that the manufacturer takes over the organisation and cost responsibility for the return and recycling. He passes then ultimately these costs across the value chain to the consumer. Thomas Rummler by the BMU has pointed out that trading at its own brands is the manufacturer responsible. I have doubt whether the legal opinion of the BMU is durable, that the commercial licensing is excluded according to the amendment. Because it can in my opinion not in the room keep to that trade in Leoprechting said breaches of duty is punishable by fines, but has no efficient ways to ensure the licensing”.