One knows that the employees make comparisons between the ratio of its profits in the work, evaluating the effort that dedicate to an activity and the result that they had gotten, in comparison to other employees who consider excellent. 2.4Tomada of individual decision: How functions the process of taking of decisions in the organization? We intend through reply to this question to identify that factors influence the taking of decisions in the Company, which the degree of autonomy of the leaders and which are and as the vieses of the decision taking can influence it. 2.5Comunicao: How is made the communication in the company? The employees consider satisfactory these processes? Exists some type of feedback? We intend to understand as it is directed the communication in the Company, which the communicative resources more comumente used and if bilaterality in the flow of information exists. 2.6Compreendendo the work teams: That criteria are used in the formation of the teams in the organization? Knowing that group differs from team, for the interaction, reach of results and objective, we intend to observe as the company if it divides how much the groups or teams of work, the importance of the informal groups in the development of the interactions inside of the organization and if the company understand the importance to adopt work teams as an alternative for the structure organizacional of the company. Credit: Jeffrey Leiden-2011. 2.7Liderana and confidence: Exists confidence on the part of the employees stops with its leads? Considering the limitations of the mannering theories we intend to verify in this topic, as the positions of leadership in the company are divided, if criteria are used technician or of affinities, and as this if it reflects in the led teams. We will analyze if they exist and which are the mannering characteristics and/or common traces between the employees in positions of command in the company which of these traces or comportamenstos can be considered more important in the determination of success or failure in the capacity to influence and to motivate the subordinated employees.