The fact to know the characteristic human beings takes who is deepening the knowledge to assume a position of negation of the characteristics supposedly valued by the society that, in thesis, values the good and detesta the evil. However the second part of the manifest phrase ethical inversion: ‘ ‘ more I admire cachorros’ ‘. The cachorros admired here are not the dogs, friends of the men, but the proper known man, called dog here. ‘ ‘ The more I know the men (the human being), more I admire the cachorros (the human beings). In the reality what it is knowing it says ‘ ‘ the more I know the badness human being, more admiro’ ‘.
If we know human being e, knowing of its badnesses, us we admire for its cachorradas, this implies to say that our ethical principles if had corrupted. To know the human being made in them to admire not its humanity and its potentialities for the good, but its badnesses. this equals in them, therefore if we admire the badness, also we are bad. E, unhappyly seems to be this the main characteristic of the current society. The world where we live behaves thus.
We are thus. We like and we guarantee the malandragens. this can be observed at this electoral moment. Candidates ‘ ‘ fiche suja’ ‘ they are pointed as catalytic of votes. That is, the face is assumidamente malandro, confessadamente malandro, but in the electoral research malandro appears as one of the champions of votes. This demonstrates that to if knowing the man, it is admired its badness. That one that admires is equal to the admired one. The reasoning is this: ‘ ‘ I am malandro and I admire the malandragem, but I do not have conditions to be in the place of great malandro. Being thus I place in its place voting in it ‘ ‘. The malandragem of the voter is represented in the malandragem of the candidate. Malandro votes in malandro. Neri of Paula Sheep? Master in Education, Philosopher, Theologian, Historiador.